It Only Takes One Shot

walter bishop

On Fringe, Walter Bishop frequently saves the day and the victim of the genetic mutation of the week with a single dose of a furiously concocted formula. And while simply watching the show means I’ve long suspended my disbelief, every time it happens I can’t help but think, yeah right. A single injection is not going to turn that razor-toothed, spinal fluid-sucking lady into the respectable human being she used to be, but presto! Walter manages it every time.

We all know that doctors can cure or prevent certain illnesses with a single jab of a needle, but what about more pervasive conditions?

It can happen—if you’re a mouse.

Recently, scientists from Johns Hopkins and the National Institutes of Health were able to cure Down syndrome in newborn mice with a single injection.

Of course, as with other medical experiments, the scientists first had to genetically engineer the mice to have extra copies of some of the genes on chromosome 21 that cause Down syndrome in humans, thus causing the mice to exhibit symptoms similar to humans who have Down’s. This is pretty much what happens on Fringe, except the scientists are evil, and never anticipate the violence and drama their wacky experiments will cause.

SAG-injected mice (TsSAG) versus non-SAG-treated Down syndrome mice (TsVeh) versus normal mice (EuVeh)  Courtesy Science Translational Medicine/AAAS

SAG-injected mice (TsSAG) versus non-SAG-treated Down syndrome mice (TsVeh)
versus normal mice (EuVeh)
(Courtesy Science Translational Medicine/AAAS)

When the mice were born, they exhibited smaller brain volumes and cerebellums, consistent with characteristics of Down’s. But on that first day, scientists injected them with a drug called SAG, which stimulates something called the Sonic Hedgehog pathway. In flies, embryos that lacked the Hedgehog protein became prickly balls, and whoever first discovered that must have enjoyed playing Sega. After all, studies show that gamers would make particularly adroit surgeons.

Anyway, the dose of SAG stimulated the Hedgehog pathway by mimicking a signaling protein, which ultimately led to completely normal development of the cerebellums of the affected mice. Not only that, but the mice that received the injection completed memory and learning tests and scored just as well on the SATs as the normal mice, even though those functions are controlled by the hippocampus, a completely different part of the brain.

The breakthrough represents hope for the eventual development of a human treatment for the currently incurable condition. While the drug “worked beautifully” on the mice, messing with the Hedgehog is risky. The pathway is crucial to brain development, so stimulating it biochemically could have unintended consequences, such as cancerous growths in the brain. The mice didn’t show evidence of such side effects, but considerably more testing needs to take place before anyone tries the drug on humans. Although that’s never stopped Walter Bishop.

Posted in Could this Happen? | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Hyperloop: Getting Citizens Out of Southern California at 700 mph


mind the gap follow up

Could This Happen doesn’t really try to predict the future–at this point, there isn’t much I think won’t happen if given enough time. Still, when one of my post on a particular invention or innovation is followed by a major leap in technology that brings that invention to pass, I get giddy. Even if it involves lab-produced meat.

While Elon Musk’s Hyperloop hasn’t been built yet, his proposal for its design and construction builds nicely on a post I wrote in April 2012 about Futurama‘s transport system becoming a reality. To read more about the Hyperloop, check out the post I wrote for Giant Freakin Robot and get ready to buy your ticket.

Posted in Could this Happen? | Comments Off on The Hyperloop: Getting Citizens Out of Southern California at 700 mph

I Think I’d Prefer My Beef Uncultured, Thanks



Could This Happen (who happens to be a vegetarian), has been following the possibilities of artificially created food, including 3-D printed pastries and burritos and lab-produced meat.

Now, the latter possibility has been officially taste-tested.

Food scientist Hanni Rutzler said the lab-grown meat that debuted in London earlier this week has “quite some flavor, quite some intense taste.” Notice she didn’t say that the flavor or taste are good. She did concede that it’s “close” to meat. Yay?

lab meat

The second official taster, author Josh Schonwald, confirmed that the texture “has a feel like meat,” and then he compared it to a McDonald’s Burger and a Boca Burger, neither of which are meat.

The lab-grown burger is less fatty than one would get from a cut of real beef, and the premier lab-grown meal took three months and about $325,000 to make. Does it at least come with a little toy?

The technology behind the synthetic meat was developed by Dr. Mark Post, head of physiology at Maastricht University, who made the burger by stringing together tens of thousands of protein strands grown in petri dishes from cattle stem cells.

lab meat production

Post’s concerns about the long-term future of meat production and consumption echo those of environmentalists and PETA activists, particularly when it comes to greenhouse gas emissions, widespread agricultural effects, and the increasing appetite of carnivores. “Meat demand is going to double in the next 40 years and right now we are using 70% of all our agricultural capacity to grow meat through livestock,” Post said. Lab-grown meat could join the ranks of free range and organic meat in terms of its sustainability and desirability. And, of course, cost.

Post’s work was funded (anonymously, and then not-so-anonymously) by Google co-founder Sergey Brin, who calls the process by which synthetic meat is made a technology with “the capability to transform how we view our world.” And how we eat it, apparently.

Now that the burger’s been tested, the project will focus on improving the taste and lowering the cost to the point that Whole Foods clamors to stock it on its shelves, right next to the $9 organic ketchup. Until then, I think I’ll limit my food adventures to 3-D printed cupcakes.

Posted in Could this Happen? | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on I Think I’d Prefer My Beef Uncultured, Thanks

Pacific Rim’s Jaegers Reflect a Departure from Hollywood Norms

slate pacific rim

In addition to the question of whether it’s possible to create mecha robots, my Slate piece addresses a cultural “could this happen?” question–namely, could we accept robots as companions rather than competitors?

Posted in Could this Happen? | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Pacific Rim’s Jaegers Reflect a Departure from Hollywood Norms

Wag the Dog, Sci-Fi Style

moon hoax

I recently read that 20% of Americans don’t believe we really landed on the moon in 1969. Apparently, the conspiracy theory has gained steam over time—why haven’t we returned since the Apollo missions? How can that American flag wave in a windless environment? And who believes anything Tricky Dick says, anyway?

Okay, sure. And Elvis is still alive and chowing down at a Burger King in my hometown of Kalamazoo, MI.

mag-wwn-elvisalive

To avoid claims of conspiracy theories as government masterminded hoaxes, I prefer it when fake astronauts admit their mission is a fake one.

A six-person crew, chosen for their “astronaut like qualities” (ability to do push-ups in near zero gravity?) are undertaking a four-month mission in which they’re living in a dome on a Hawaiian volcano to simulate a Mars mission.

If this sounds like science fiction to you, you’re not wrong.

Capricorn One, released in 1978, combines elements of the Mars simulation mission and the moon landing conspiracy theories to tell the story of a Mars landing hoax. What’s even stranger is that one of the astronauts in the film is played by none other than O.J. Simpson, who apparently was getting some good practice at perpetrating falsehoods.

The film’s premise sounds fairly plausible: humans are finally on the way to Mars (perhaps using one of those Star Trek deflector shields to stave off the radiation) when, during the final launch paid preparations, NASA realizes that a defective life support system will kill the astronauts in flight. But, in a case of art imitating life, they know they need to continue—the manned space program needs it. So they fake the landing, spiriting the astronauts away to an army space as the spacecraft launches, empty unbeknownst to the public. The astronauts are ultimately compelled to go along with the hoax, buying into the patriotic duty argument. And, as you can imagine, the situation goes downhill from there. We’ve got blackmail and coercion, imprisonment, manipulation, mysterious disappearances, etc. And no, the astronauts never made it to the Kalamazoo Burger King.

394px-Capricorn_one

But a fake mission that touts itself all along as fake is a totally different story. It might not be a sci-fi thriller, but it’s still got plenty of science. The Hawaiian space Exploration Analog and Simulation (HI-SEAS) mission primarily exists to study astronaut food options for long missions, such as a mission to Mars.

Space food is nasty—it’s just true. While it might seem momentarily neat to try and reconstitute freeze dried food or squeeze it light toothpaste from a tube (space food from a tube has been abandoned, given its grossness and the weight of the tube), astronauts generally don’t love their cosmic culinary options, and on most space trips, astronauts lose weight. On a long-haul mission to Mars, the effects of such dietary restrictions aren’t healthy or sustainable.

In other words, if we’re going to put people on Mars, we need to be able to feed them something other than Tang. In addition to confining themselves in a dome (and wearing mock spacesuits if/when they leave), the HI-SEAS crew dines on various types of experimental space food and monitors the results.

Space food has improved for the better—the Japanese, for example, have produced space ramen and even sushi. Russian crews on the International Space Station have about 300 menu items available to them. Korean astronauts even sampled a space-version of kimchi, which took researchers many years and millions of dollars to figure out how to make.

800px-JAXA_Space_food_Ramen_(Soy_sauce)

The benefit of Mars is that because of its gravity (about 1/3rd of Earth’s), it’s possible to actually cook food there. The HI-SEAS astronauts are testing out some possible Mars voyage staples, such as dehydrated broccoli, rice, and Spam. They hope to figure out how to bake bread and “make crab cakes” on Mars. Whatever they bring, they’d better choose wisely—it costs about $10,000 per pound to bring food (or anything else) into space. And since a Mars trip could take 150-300 days each way, the food has to last.

Reports from HI-SEAS indicate that they’ve been eating “Russian cabbage pie, Puerto Rican arroz con pollo, Moroccan beef tagine, homemade vanilla ice cream, a Tibetan porridge made of milled, roasted barley, and cheese and broccoli omelets.” Tangfastic! When they’re not cooking, they’re devising new recipes.

The HI-SEAS mission is also training its crew for another crucial part of a space operation: blogging and facebooking. Because everything we read on the internets is real!

Posted in Could this Happen? | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Wag the Dog, Sci-Fi Style

Here to Serve

ballbot-starwars
The Star Wars cantina scene demonstrates how awesome it would be to sidle up to a bar (preferably on some kind of bounty hunting mission) and order a drink from aliens. Attack of the Clones features a robot waitress, which was probably the best thing about that movie. While we know of no ETs willing to serve up nightcaps or flip burgers, robot waiters are no longer science fiction.

harbin robot waiter
In Harbin, China, robots that resemble Daleks wait tables, cook meals, and seat diners. At the Robot Restaurant, diners are greeted by a robot host who says, “Earth Person, Hello.” In the kitchen, robots whip up dumplings and noodles and then robot waiters bring them to the tables via conveyor belts in the floor. As if that’s not enough, robots entertain diners with songs.

137614-dalu-robot-restaurant
In the Dalu Robot Restaurant in Jinan, China’s first robot eatery, the robots more closely resemble Star Wars droids. They circle the dining room on a conveyor belt with a cart loaded with food, serving up up dishes dim-sum style. They stop when their sensors detect someone reaching for food. These robots cost about $6,000 each, not including consistent operating and upkeep costs. Other robot waiters cost tens of thousands of dollars.

Similar robo-restaurants can be found in Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, and Thailand. Some of these robots can respond to basic voice commands (which is more than some human waiters do), but most take orders via touch screens.

While this technology may seem novel and impressive, it has its detractors. The head of Duke University’s Robotics Laboratory dismissed these robo-waiters, calling them “really just a conveyor belt, bringing food from the kitchen, with lots of bells and whistles.” But people love bells and whistles! And people love robots—especially when they’ve got food.

YO-Sushi-iTray-1
Now, the trend has caught on in the Western World. A sushi chain in London, which has already incorporated robot drink carts and conveyor belts, now uses drones to deliver food to tables. Unlike the Chinese restaurants, the iTray flies and is controlled by an iPad. The iTray can move at 25 miles an hour, though that seems a bit risky if it’s loaded with food and drinks. While this one isn’t a conveyor belt, it does require people to take their order off the tray. It doesn’t mind being ogled, though.

Scientists predict that as AI develops, robo-waiters will become more conversant, engaging diners in ways only the most adroit waitstaff can. What’s more, they’ll never complain if you return the food or decide to order an omelette with sixteen ingredients. Right now, these robots are pricier than their human counter-parts, even though they don’t expect tips. But as the production costs go down, they may end up saving restaurateurs money. They’ll never request vacations or holiday pay and they’ll never need health insurance or file a worker’s comp claim.
But before we get too comfortable with the notion of complaint and uncomplaining wait staff, we should consider that someday they could become aware enough to unionize or rebel for lack of tips. And who knows what they’ll do once they realize how crappy the gratuities are.

Posted in Could this Happen? | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Here to Serve

Space For All

Syncom-2
In 1945, science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke published a paper suggesting that we put satellites in geostationary orbit. 18 years later, America launched Syncom 2. Soon, there will be one more satellite in the Clarke Belt, roughly 26,000 miles above Earth.

On Wednesday, Planetary Resources, otherwise known as the “asteroid mining company,” announced a project designed to “change the way humanity explores the cosmos.”

With NASA’s budgetary woes poised to get even worse if the sequester continues and the recent problems with the Kepler telescope, now seems like a good time to rejuvenate the public’s investment in space, which is the goal of this new project.

In the next couple of years, Planetary Resources will be putting into orbit a prospecting satellite/telescope called ARKYD. But this particular telescope isn’t going to be dedicated to finding gold in them asteroids. Anyone who wants to use the telescope can look for planets, stars, asteroids, or other celestial objects—in other words, people will get to point the thing and see what’s there. It’s not yet clear what else people might be able to use the satellite for, but given that the project is the first of its kind, Planetary Resources seems to be leaving room for it to evolve for, with, and by its users.

While particulars regarding who gets to use the telescope and when have yet to be ironed out, some type of time share between the public and educational institutions will likely be scheduled through Planetary Resources. Schools, students, and researchers working on space-related projects could use the telescope to help develop their own work—they’ll be able to determine, at least in part, what information it harvests. And even though I’m not entirely sure about all of the implications, the geek in me gets excited at the idea of being connected to a satellite. Just as long as there’s no spying….

But Planetary Resources isn’t going to pony up all the money for this. It’s also launched a Kickstarter campaign to raise $1 million for the satellite’s operation. While Zach Braff’s recent Kickstarter foray has raised questions about entities with deep pockets using the site, it makes sense that Planetary Resources would go this route—in fact, it’s been tossing around this idea for a while. Given the astronomic (literally) costs of developing, building, and operating a satellite (estimates are in the hundreds of millions), $1 million is a modest ask. Space is expensive. It costs $71 million each for NASA astronauts to tag along on Russian spacecraft. Virgin Galactic, part of the burgeoning space tourism industry, requires those who want to visit the cosmos to put down a deposit for the full fare—$200 million. This isn’t about us sitting back and watching Guy Laiberte or other wealthy, Earth-weary tourists experience space. This is about marshaling public involvement and ownership. If the public is going to use this satellite, why shouldn’t the public invest in it? Planetary Resources is asking for less than 1 percent of the operating cost, which seems about right. Donating means that we think space is worth not just federal monies, but a little bit of ours, too. Planetary Resources will launch the satellite regardless of what Kickstarter brings in, but why not get some headshots in front of Earth along the way? That’s one perk on offer for those who contribute to the fund.

Unlike any other satellite, ARKYD has the potential to pave the way for a new, revitalized relationship between humans and the cosmos. Clarke would approve.

Posted in Could this Happen? | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Space For All

Terminate This!

robocop-1987-movie-poster-01 In science fiction, robots have been solving cases and apprehending criminals for a while. From Robocop to Terminator to THX 1138 the idea that robots may replace police officers has in recent years begun the transition from fiction to fact.

Right now, Robot Combat League demonstrates some of the most advanced hand-to-hand combat-capable robots and the military continues to develop all kinds of fighting machines. But in terms of local law enforcement, the recent events in Boston bring into focus the question of to what extent robots may be able to assist, if not replace police officers in dangerous situations.

Initially, accounts circulated that a robot helped remove the tarp from the boat where Dzhokhar Tsarnaev hid as police scoured Watertown and Cambridge. Later information revealed that the robot used to remove the tarp from the boat was actually a mechanical arm extending from a law enforcement vehicle. Even though the owner of the boat had already peeked under the tarp, the use of the mechanical arm allowed law enforcement to remain at a safe(r) distance, poised and ready for whatever they would find.

In my head, I rewrite the scene so some terrifying version of Robocop exposes an unsuspecting Tsarnaev and proceeds to deliver robojustice. I’ve clearly watched far too much science fiction.

t800metal

However, in Watertown, police did use a robot to examine a car, presumably the green Honda allegedly abandoned by the suspect as he fled. A similar robot searched for bombs in Cambridge around the suspects’ residence. Another removed suspicious packages from a car in New York on Friday. In addition to locating, removing, and diffusing explosive devices, these robots can also conduct controlled detonations.

These kinds of robots are becoming increasingly common in investigations, as well in places such as Afghanistan and Iraq, when explosives or bomb threats are involved. Police robots are neither sentient nor autonomous—they cannot think or make decisions. They’re controlled remotely, either via radio signals, like a remote-controlled car (which necessitates having an onboard battery much like those used in cars), or a power cable from a console containing software made specifically for the robot. Some models use joysticks, while others take commands input via a keyboard. Regardless of the mechanism, the control consoles are always portable, which allows police to keep a distance but maintain visual contact with the robot.

These robots often have treads, like tanks, though some have special wheels that can be individually controlled to help maneuver over rough landscapes. Some can navigate stairs and right themselves if they get tipped over. Their casing helps protect them from weather—many of these robots can move in substantial amounts of water—and sometimes even from explosions.

Police robots come equipped with at least one camera (often two or three) that feeds video to the console. Depending on the complexity of the robot, these cameras might have night and/or infrared vision. Most police robots also have an audio system that allows police to hear what’s happening. The audio-visual capabilities enable the use of these robots for surveillance. Many have GPS tracking systems.

These robots need to be dexterous enough to handle and remove objects, so they come equipped with at least one jointed “arm” that can extend and flex, allowing the robot to maneuver into tight spaces, as well as grasp, and move objects. These robots can also move heavy objects, including people, from dangerous areas.

Some police robots have sensors that allow them to detect chemical, biological, or radioactive weapons.

iRobot, a Massachusetts company, produces the PackBot reportedly used to search the car thought to have been driven by the Boston bombers. The PackBot, which can be programmed for specific missions, can be used to detect explosives, as well as neutralize and dispose of them. Similar robots have long been used to diffuse and remove and IEDs (improved explosive devices) such as the ones used in Monday’s bombing and abroad in places like Iraq and Afghanistan. The PackBot can also be used in hazmat situations, as well as to aid infantry troops in combat and emergency first responders.

irobot_warrior

iRobot also has a Warrior robot, which is bigger and more powerful than the PackBot (it can move an entire car, or, as seen in the video, pop the trunk and remove a hazardous device from the backseat).

More police robots can be seen (and purchased, if you’re feeling unsafe and wealthy) here.

More advanced models, such as the SWAT robot developed by Howe & Howe Technologies in Waterboro, Maine, offer increased protection to first responders and officers engaged in confrontations. This model, the first “designed specifically for ballistic shield purposes,” also has the capability to break down doors and tow away cars, and was ironically set to be unveiled in Boston last week. While it carries a hefty $98,000 price tag, it seems cheap when compared to the cost of human lives.

Given the relative ease of making IEDs (directions can be found on the internet, of course), which were responsible for the Boston Marathon explosions, the Oklahoma City bombing, and the detonation that killed 77 people at a youth camp in Norway, among others, experts predict that IEDs will become an increasingly serious and commonplace problem. While I have nothing but admiration and faith in law enforcement, especially after the events of the past week, I’m further comforted reassured by knowing that they—and all of us—have robotic back-up.

Posted in Could this Happen? | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Terminate This!

Which One of these Girls is Not Like the Others?

orphan black - slate Since we can’t make the day longer, other than by adding leap seconds here and there, cloning ourselves would seem like the next best thing…unless it’s not. Find out about recent advances in human cloning by reading my article on Slate.

Posted in Could this Happen? | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Which One of these Girls is Not Like the Others?

Bugging Out

cronos scarab
In Guillermo Del Toro’s movie Cronos, an ancient device embodied in a scarab restores youth and vigor to the aged antique dealer who finds it. It also creates a taste for blood; near the end of the movie, the now young and voracious man licks the floor of a bathroom to get some of the good red stuff.

The 1993 film Robot Wars features giant robotic scorpions. And while not robotic in nature, Robert Heinlein’s Starship Troopers and Orson Scott Card’s Ender’s Game put arachnids and buggers at the center of their science fictional universes. And who could forget Mothra?

Even when not roboticized, insects, especially giant ones, represent otherworldliness. Even though over a million species of insects exist on earth, and even though there are 1.6 billion times more insects than humans—that’s 10 quintillion for anyone who’s counting—the physical appearance, movements, and bizarre adaptations make insects seem alien, which partly explains why they give so many people the willies.

It might seem crazy, creepy, or just plain strange that robotics companies find inspiration in these creatures. Although once you put robot and insect together, they ironically become less alien, less cringe-worthy, and even beautiful. I never thought I’d be saying that about an insect, but that’s technology for you.

Steampunk inspires the beautiful robot insects created by artist Mike Libby, who orders (or occasionally collects himself) beetles, arachnids, butterflies, dragonflies, and other insect specimens from around the world and couples them with mechanical parts from watches, typewriters, and other machines. These insects serve as showpieces rather than functional robots, but the design and the idea are more than art. “Both biologists and engineers look to insect movement, design and social behavior to inspire new technology and applications,” says Libby in his artist’s statement. “Some of the most advanced aircraft is smaller than a dragonfly, and NASA scientists are making walking rovers and ‘swarm theory’ probes for planetary exploration. Technology is finding that the most efficient design features comes from natural systems.”

The sand flea robot by Boston Dynamics perfectly exemplifies Libby’s point. While the sand flea robot lacks the visual artistry of Libby’s creations, it surpasses them by leaps and bounds. It looks like a little dune buggy motoring along, but when it jumps, it gets air that’s anything but tiny.

Like a cat, the robot always lands on its wheels thanks to gyro stabilization—an axis and momentum-based orienting technique used by countless machines, from helicopters to motion picture camera systems. This system also stabilizes the onboard camera and keeps the sand flea level as it leaps. Fueled by carbon dioxide, this bot can jump 25 times before needing a refill. Its jumping ability, as well as its long-range GPS remote control and surveillance capabilities, make it particularly useful in war zones, especially those laden with land mines.

If remote controlling a sand flea robot somehow gets old, there’s DARPA’s remote-controlled beetle. This one’s a little different, as it involves an actual live beetle outfitted with pack that links up to its brain and wing muscles.

Scientists can make the beetle fly and turn left or right at various angles and planes, which is similar to—though perhaps more dramatic than—controlling the minds of worms.

In watching these videos, I can’t help but feel sorry for the beetle, as its own impulses and ability to control its movements are overridden entirely. Here’s hoping it can’t feel fear. Or resentment or vengeance.

from Wired.co.uk

from Wired.co.uk

Researchers at North Carolina State University have done similar experiments on a Madagascar hissing cockroach (I think I’ll stick with the beetle, thanks) and the University of Michigan has developed a cyborg moth. House flies are next, with many more to come.

The last robotic insect development we’ll cover is arguably the closest we’ve gotten to achieving sentience in robots. Engineers from the universities of Sheffield and Sussex are working on uploading bees’ brains into flying robotic bodies, where they will be combined with software to create new, autonomous brains. Scientists aim to capitalize on naturally occurring capabilities such as sight, smell, and maneuverability, and they hope that these bees will be able to think, move, improvise, and adapt to new situations like real bees would. They’re also hoping that the robotic bees will help alleviate the declining bee population and its effects.

2015 is the target year for the first flight of the “cybee.” Classical music accompaniment will hopefully follow.

Such cyborg animals could investigate suspicious, dangerous, or tiny spaces. They could be used for surveillance—it’s even possible that the fly on the wall could actually be a spy. The part that scares me most, though, is the stinging potential of a cybee. Presuming their bodies are equipped with a stinger, it seems reasonable to predict that they wouldn’t lose their stingers after a single attack. And who knows what that sting would actually do or be (cue paranoid theories about miniscule tracking systems here). Also, it’s unclear whether the cybee would be more or less inclined to sting humans, but if it really can think and act accordingly, we might want to play nice and keep those flowers growing.

Posted in Could this Happen? | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Bugging Out